Loading...
ISSN 2348-8697

How to Be a Reviewer of Contemporary Dialogue?

Reviewers play an essential part in science and in scholarly publishing. Scientists and scholars have relied upon peer review to validate research, engage other specialists in the support of submitted work, and increase networking possibilities within specific specialist communities.

Although in recent years the peer review process has attracted some criticism, it remains the only widely accepted method for research validation and a cornerstone of the scientific publishing process. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities like most scientific journals, relies on effective peer review processes to uphold not only the quality and validity of individual articles, but also the overall integrity of the journal.

The Contemporary Dialogue (CD) expects its reviewers to have experience in publishing, especially in Scopus index publications.

To be a reviewer of Contemporary Dialogue, simply download the Reviewer's Application Form, complete it, and send it to the Chief Executive Editor via email. You will be informed of the outcome of your application within 2 weeks of your submission.

Please submit the 'Reviewer's Application Form' and your CV to the Chief Executive Editor via email at contemporarydialog@gmail.com or Email the editor

Reviewers should read the "Manuscript Reviewing Guide" below before evaluating the manuscripts using the ScholarOneTM Online Submission system.

Requirements

  • Expertise in any field of social sciences and education
  • Prior experience in academic publishing or peer reviewing (preferred)
  • A commitment to providing timely and constructive feedback

Manuscript Reviewing Guide

This guide contains the following items:

  1. The Contemporary Dialogue review process
  2. Reviewer's guidelines for article evaluation

Developed and Managed by Sanjeev Chauhan, University of Hyderabad.